Thus, Euthyphro is brought to a realization by this dialectical method that his definition of piety is not sufficiently meaningful. Socrates concludes that if Euthyphro's definition of piety is acceptable, then there must exist at least one thing that is both pious and impious (as it is both loved and hated by the gods)-which Euthyphro admits is absurd. Therefore, Socrates reasons, at least one thing exists that certain gods love but other gods hate. ![]() But, Socrates also has Euthyphro agreeing that the gods are quarrelsome and their quarrels, like human quarrels, concern objects of love or hatred. Euthyphro replies that the pious is that which is loved by the gods. įor example, in the Euthyphro, Socrates asks Euthyphro to provide a definition of piety. In common cases, Socrates used enthymemes as the foundation of his argument. ![]() The principal aim of Socratic activity may be to improve the soul of the interlocutors, by freeing them from unrecognized errors or indeed, by teaching them the spirit of inquiry. The detection of error does not amount to a proof of the antithesis for example, a contradiction in the consequences of a definition of piety does not provide a correct definition. The method is largely destructive, in that false belief is exposed and only constructive in that this exposure may lead to further search for truth. The Socratic dialogues are a particular form of dialectic known as the method of elenchus (literally, "refutation, scrutiny" ) whereby a series of questions clarifies a more precise statement of a vague belief, logical consequences of that statement are explored, and a contradiction is discovered. It was a sophistic art of giving to one's ignorance, indeed even to one's intentional tricks, the outward appearance of truth, by imitating the thorough, accurate method which logic always requires, and by using its topic as a cloak for every empty assertion." Socratic method To the Ancients, "it was nothing but the logic of illusion. Īccording to Kant, however, the ancient Greeks used the word "dialectic" to signify the logic of false appearance or semblance. Aristotle said that it was the pre-Socratic philosopher Zeno of Elea who invented dialectic, of which the dialogues of Plato are the examples of the Socratic dialectical method. Moreover, the term "dialectic" owes much of its prestige to its role in the philosophies of Socrates and Plato, in the Greek Classical period (5th to 4th centuries BC). The outcome of such a dialectic might be the refutation of a relevant proposition, or of a synthesis, or a combination of the opposing assertions, or a qualitative improvement of the dialogue. In classical philosophy, dialectic ( διαλεκτική) is a form of reasoning based upon dialogue of arguments and counter-arguments, advocating propositions (theses) and counter-propositions ( antitheses). There is a variety of meanings of dialectic or dialectics within Western philosophy. The emphasis on process is particularly marked in Hegelian dialectic, and even more so in Marxist dialectical logic, which tried to account for the evolution of ideas over longer time periods in the real world. The dialectics of Hegel and Marx were criticized in the twentieth century by the philosophers Karl Popper and Mario Bunge.ĭialectic tends to imply a process of evolution and so does not naturally fit within classical logics, but was given some formalism in the twentieth century. Dialectical materialism, a theory or set of theories produced mainly by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, adapted the Hegelian dialectic into arguments regarding traditional materialism. ![]() Within Hegelianism, the word dialectic has the specialised meaning of a contradiction between ideas that serves as the determining factor in their relationship. Dialectic is alternatively known as minor logic, as opposed to major logic or critique. Dialectic may thus be contrasted with both the eristic, which refers to argument that aims to successfully dispute another's argument (rather than searching for truth), and the didactic method, wherein one side of the conversation teaches the other. Dialectic resembles debate, but the concept excludes subjective elements such as emotional appeal and rhetoric (in the modern pejorative sense). ![]() For electrical insulators, see dielectric.ĭialectic ( Greek: διαλεκτική, dialektikḗ related to dialogue German: Dialektik), also known as the dialectical method, is a discourse between two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but wishing to establish the truth through reasoned argumentation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |